Important update: Your Online Network will be 'Read Only' from 5pm on Wednesday 19 March, This means:
you can search and browse to view public discussions and comments, however you can't sign in, view private group discussions, add new posts, send messages or join private groups (read full details via link) here.
you can search and browse to view public discussions and comments, however you can't sign in, view private group discussions, add new posts, send messages or join private groups (read full details via link) here.
Pathology results

MelV83
Member Posts: 32 ✭
Hey everyone,
I’m trying to understand my histopathology report from my biopsy and I’m hoping someone here has answers, as I won’t get to see a doctor till the 19th November.
I’m trying to understand my histopathology report from my biopsy and I’m hoping someone here has answers, as I won’t get to see a doctor till the 19th November.
This is what the report says:
”The cores of breast tissue are infiltrated by an invasive ductal carcinoma. The tumour forms solid nests and cords of atypical ductal epithelial cells displaying a moderate degree of nuclear pleomorphism. In addition, several multinucleated giant cells are noted indicating invasive ductal carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells.”
I also have a Ki-67 of 30-40%. My report also states the cancer is oestrogen and progesterone receptor positive and HER-2 low.
”The cores of breast tissue are infiltrated by an invasive ductal carcinoma. The tumour forms solid nests and cords of atypical ductal epithelial cells displaying a moderate degree of nuclear pleomorphism. In addition, several multinucleated giant cells are noted indicating invasive ductal carcinoma with osteoclastic giant cells.”
I also have a Ki-67 of 30-40%. My report also states the cancer is oestrogen and progesterone receptor positive and HER-2 low.
I do have a good understanding of anatomy and anatomical terms as I’m a science teacher- and epithelial means skin cells and osteoclastic should have something to do with bones.
So does this mean I likely have metastatic disease with Mets in skin and bone?
I’m likely just having anxiety but because I have so long to wait for the appointment and I can’t call the line until Monday I’m hoping someone else has had similar results.
Tagged:
1
Comments
-
-
Hi @MelV83
That seems an awfully long time to have to wait and see your Dr to have the results explained to you and have a plan of action, if it possible to see if the appointment can be brought forward?
My own story was - found a lump on the Sunday, , saw my GP the next day ( Monday) had mammogram and ultrasound two days after that, biopsy two days after that , results delivered to me by my GP within a week after that ( stage 2 lobular breast cancer) and saw breast cancer surgeon a few days after that.
The breast cancer surgeon sent me for more tests including scans and an MRI - what further tests will be different in each individual case.
I was recommended a mastectomy due to the size of my tumour and I had the surgery within 6 weeks of finding the lump .
I do believe there are guidelines about how long after diagnosis surgery should be ( whether a lumpectomy or mastectomy).
I did find my GP ( who was female and very experienced) was great at helping me navigate it all - can you call on your GP here?
What city/region are you in? You can add this to your profile and others on here may be able to give you more targeted advice .
Also you might want to call the BCNA hotline Monday morning to have a chat.
I do recall my surgeon telling me my cancer was slow growing and we had time to do further tests etc but once I knew it was cancer it felt like I had a time bomb inside me and I was desperate to get it out!
One very good piece of advice my GP gave me was that I should the my husband to all the appointments initially as I would still likely be in shock and not taking everything in .
Take care .
1 -
@MelV83 my pathology was dumbed down for me.Invasive ductal carcinoma ER & PR + Her - its feelers had attached to my skin , muscle and sternum. At the time it was thought the lymph glands were reactionary to tumour the Ki 67 was never mentioned that I can remember been nearly 8 yrs now
A more detailed report was done after breast conserving lumpectomy and 4 lymph glands taken that it had spread to the lymph nodes. The Oncologist was fantastic at answering my questions.My order of treatment was Chemo 5 mths long done in hopes to shrink the tumour then the surgery followed by radiation. Each of our treatment plans are worked out on case by case.2