Have your say - Survey on BreastScreen Australia’s Position Statement on Breast Density

The Australian Department of Health is considering whether BreastScreen Australia’s Position Statement on Breast Density needs to be changed. The Department has commissioned Allen + Clarke, a consulting company, to undertake a short, online survey to get the views of researchers, clinicians and women who use BreastScreen services.
Currently, women who participate in BreastScreen are NOT routinely told about their breast density. The exception is the WA BreastScreen Program, which sends a letter to the woman and her GP if the woman is assessed as having very dense breasts.
It can be harder to detect cancers on mammograms of women with very dense breasts as breast density can hide or 'mask' breast cancers. Research has shown that having very dense breasts is also a risk factor for breast cancer.
This survey is an important chance to share your views about whether or not BreastScreen Australia should talk to women about breast density.
While more scientific research is needed to help health professionals understand how women with very dense breasts can best be screened and/or manage their breast cancer risk, many women argue that they want to be told.
The survey will close on 27 June 2018. Your
responses are anonymous.
Tips on taking the survey
Some of the survey questions have been written in a complicated way. We have developed the following tips to help you have your say.
- Please read BreastScreen Australia’s
Position Statement on Breast Density before you take
the survey. The survey asks if you have read the Statement and you cannot
proceed with the survey if you answer ‘no’.
If it's easier, you can read a summary of the Position Statement on the Information Forum on Mammographic Density (INFORMD) website.
- Please read BCNA’s webpage about breast density
before you take the survey.
- BCNA member Kate has shared her story about breast
density, which you can read here.
- Question 6 of the survey asks what ‘evidence-based’
changes you would like to see to the position statement and asks you to
provide ‘citations’ (e.g. journal articles). Please don't be put off
by the language in this question. BCNA has provided feedback to Allen +
Clarke that women’s views are important and should not need to be
‘evidence-based’.
We encourage you to share your views about breast density in the open-text boxes at either question 6 or question 7 and not to be concerned with the way question 6 has been asked.
- You can skip questions (i.e. leave them blank), but
please make sure that you click through to the end of the survey and click
‘submit.
How to participate?
You can take the survey here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/BSApositionstatementonbreastdensity.
Please also don’t hesitate to email the BCNA Policy Team on [email protected] if you have questions.
Comments
A Mammogram is only as good as the person 'reading it & giving the report'! In my case - they must have been asleep! They obviously didn't read the Mammogram Request - or they would have SEEN where the tumours were!
The information in this document is misleading and inconsistent.
It agrees that women with Dense Breasts are at increased risk at developing Breast Cancer but then says it is not worth Breast Screen Australia recording the statistics of the number of women presenting for Mammograms with Dense Breasts! They have the perfect opportunity to do so ..... and yet it is not a part of their mandate!
Women with Dense Breasts need to be ADVISED of their increased risk of developing Breast Cancer (as currently occurs in WA) & they should also be given yearly (or 2 yearly) Ultrasounds at the very least, bypassing Mammograms altogether (as that is basically an unnecessary double service.)
From my own experience - I have NO CONFIDENCE IN MAMMOGRAMS AT ALL as a direct result of my recent diagnosis of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma - and I recommend all my friends to have Ultrasounds now - even if they have to pay for it.
Lobular cancers are notoriously difficult to pick up via mammogram as they often don't look like a lump or mass. My GP had mentioned that my previous mammograms had shown I had dense/ lumpy breast tissue but there was no discussion about increased risk, despite my mum also having had the disease. I had been having mammograms since I was in my early 40s as I was worried about developing bc, and paid for private mammograms every couple of years - clearly I needn't have bothered
One buddy (who is a Top Young radiologist) shot me this info!! Well worth a read.
I have worked at Breastscreen and in private radiology clinics and all mammograms are independently double read by either two specialist radiologists, or a computer program plus a radiologist.
Only certain types of breast cancer are detectable on mammogram (fortunately, it is the most common one which is detected) - mammograms look for tiny microcalcifications which are only seen in a few types of breast cancer.
Ultrasound will also only detect certain types of breast cancer, and again MRI will only detect certain types of breast cancer.
Essentially, I do agree that there needs to be more awareness about the limitations of mammograms in people with dense breast tissue (the other issue is cancer is white on mammogram as is dense breast tissue white - so dense breast tissue hides it!).
I really don't want you to discourage people from having mammograms - they absolutely have their use, but again, have their limitations as they are only a screening test not a diagnostic test.
I also have no confidence in mammograms as I had dense breast tissue & my 140mm/14cm tumor was not detected at all on mammograms or ultrasounds
So sorry to hear that your story is like mine, in my 40s & wasting money on private mammograms that showed nothing! Ended up with 140mm invasive lobular stage 3 when a biopsy was finally done, only cos I insisted something was wrong & someone listened to me
I am So sorry to hear that! I hope you are going OK now.
I hope that you (and others on the forum) actually DO the survey & also share all the 'italic' bits from my posts above to all your girldriends and family members ..... cos it pays to be 'advised', specially if 'THEY' won't tell you that you have dense breasts - or you don't know the ramifications of having dense breasts.
Their own current TV advertising admits that 80% of current diagnoses are from women with NO previous family history - so always go with your gut.
There are SO many being diagnosed under 50 these days, too - it is so sad!
& have been sharing my situation to warn others
Make sure you read the 2nd bit in italics as well from my buddy, the radiologist .... as the 3 main methods of BC detention ALL play a part ... so I don’t want people to think ALL mammograms are useless .... just not necessarily the one for women with dense breast tissue
I am SO sorry that you have been thru all this added stress & surgery - when in reality, it SHOULD have been caught SO much earlier. 12cm - that is massive!
I simply CANNOT believe that BreastScreen Australia have the opportunity to ADVISE women that they have dense breast tissue - and don't!
I WAS aware that I had 'lumpy' breasts ..... but NOT aware of any increased risk of not being detected/diagnosed ... matter of fact, the 'so called clear' mammograms actually gave us a sense of false security.
Even if they had said it in their 'letter' afterwards ..... where they 'cover themselves' by saying there is no guarantee that you DON'T have cancer! They could add it right there - that women with dense breast tissue or 'lumpy' breasts - should have different tests & maybe BYPASS mammograms altogether.
Same here, mammograms since 41..... 2 "clear" aged 45.... 5 cm tumour of nowhere!!! I wasn't told a thing, and didn't think or know anything about breast density, being both a risk factor and reducing tumour detection..... thought I was doing the right thing, as I had 2 older female relatives that had breast cancer. Its a disgrace that all Australians aren't given this information, uniformly across Australia, and not just in WA...… My GP didn't really know anything about this either! Also said that dads side relatives weren't an issue!!