Treatment decisions-Triple negative

Options
2»

Comments

  • Feathers
    Feathers Member Posts: 16 ✭
    Options
    Hi Kelly
    I found your feedback on Capecitabine very interesting.  My oncologist said to me that the research was not conducted on people with TNB so I would be really interested in reading the research that says otherwise. Are you able to get hold of the research details?
     I was stage 3 with the spread of cancer in nearly half my lymph nodes so I am definitely in the target study group. 

    Sorry I can’t help with your decision as to whether you proceed with a mastectomy. 

  • KellyG99
    KellyG99 Member Posts: 2 ✭
    Options
    I think this is the study. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1612645 
    The significant part according to my oncologist was "residual cancer cells after treatment" - my triple negative tumour was resistant to something in the chemo mix I was given but oncology couldn't pin down exactly what. The key data for me in deciding was "rate of disease free survival was higher in the capecitabine group (82%)" and also "74% were alive and free from cancer at  5 years",  a 10% and 5% improvement compared to the control group who didn't receive capecitabine. 

    I hate looking at statistics, who can say what part of the group I'll fall into? the 82% who do great or the 18% who get a recurrence despite all they do? I was incredibly lucky to find my cancer, although I certainly didn't feel lucky at the time. I had no symptoms and it was a totally random decision to get a breast screen - I had one at 50, I was going to turn 54 and thought I should just check because its free, so why not?  A small triple negative cancer was found, in my surgeons opinion no more than three months old but already stage III. 

    I have young kids as we were only able to start a family with the help of IVF and I want to be around with them for as long as possible. So while my Dr tells me my odds of getting another triple negative breast cancer are the same as for someone who hasn't had one, the thought of going through another two year stint of chemo and operations frightens me. I don't have the gene but no one can say why I got this or that it won't come back and this time I or the scan miss it.  I am hoping that if my luck turns and despite all tests to the contrary some cancerous cells migrated through my lymph system that the additional capecitabine has dealt with those. The mastectomy is for peace of mind (I think). 
  • Feathers
    Feathers Member Posts: 16 ✭
    Options
    Thanks Kelly for your response and sending through the link to the study. It certainly reads a more positive result than I was lead to believe and I will now follow it up with my oncologist. There is always an unknown regarding residual cancer. I was told the chance of my cancer returning was 30 to 40% as it was locally advanced. To me I have greater odds of it not returning then it returning. 

    I had had a breast screen 4 months before I found my lump so either the cancer developed and grew after the screen or the screening didn’t pick it up. 

    In terms of whether you go ahead and get a mastectomy is not an easy decision but it’s a decision you need to feel right about and have no regrets no matter the outcome......no I should have or shouldn’t haves. There are no certainties with cancer so go with what gives you peace of mind. 
     I wish you well. 
  • Belleindy
    Belleindy Member Posts: 13 ✭
    Options
    I'm starting capecitabine today, so glad you got through it with without any terrible side effects. I had a horrible time during adjuvant chemo and had to stop taxol treatment early so I'm having capecitabine tablets just to make sure they get all the cancer. I also had a lumpectomy with radiation but if I need to have a mastectomy down the track I will have one. I've already decided that I'm definitely going down that route if I have to. 

Categories