Zoffiel
9 years agoMember
It's back.
After a disease free interval of 10 years, my lobular carcinoma is back. You bewdy. The first tumour took months to diagnose, the new one was in the site of an old seroma that I had been monitoring for years. Now, suddenly its in my lymph glands and has vascular involvement. CT and bone scans..I'm back on the cancer train. I'm not as upset as people seem to think I should be, after all, it's taken 10 years for the 'second boot to hit the ground. It happens. The thing is, I'm disappointed to find that some critical aspects of cancer treatment in region Victoria have not changed.
10 years ago I took the recommended route and signed up with the medical oncologist that was suggested. This company is a private operation that bluntly refuses to bulk bill any of their patients. In essence, as soon as someone up this way gets a cancer diagnosis, the money tap opens and spurts funds into their already bulging coffers. This time I've decided that the private med oncs have enough fancy cars and flashy homes so I'm seeing an oncologist who bulk bills. But that means I have to travel to Melbourne.
I'm pretty shitty about this. I want to know why, given all the palaver about equity of access, there has been no obvious attempt to make cancer treatment affordable in country areas. The situation with radiotherapy has improved--it's now subsidised so I won't be out of pocket for that element of my treatment. For which I am extremely grateful. 10 years ago I couldn't afford radiation therapy and was not told that I could have had it in at a metro area. So I didn't have it. Which may (or may not) have made a difference to my current circumstances.
I'm not working and simply can not afford to pay those pirates--it would cost me my home and I'm pretty much screwed anyway so being broke, homeless and dying isn't an attractive option. I might add, that I worked right through my first episode and have been made redundant recently, so the not working bit is not by choice.
Ironically, it costs the system (that's you and me) about the same for my to claim VTPAS for every trip as It would to subsidise the gap between what the Pirates charge and what medicare rebates. I'm going to Make A Fuss. Anyone else got a tale to tell about this?
10 years ago I took the recommended route and signed up with the medical oncologist that was suggested. This company is a private operation that bluntly refuses to bulk bill any of their patients. In essence, as soon as someone up this way gets a cancer diagnosis, the money tap opens and spurts funds into their already bulging coffers. This time I've decided that the private med oncs have enough fancy cars and flashy homes so I'm seeing an oncologist who bulk bills. But that means I have to travel to Melbourne.
I'm pretty shitty about this. I want to know why, given all the palaver about equity of access, there has been no obvious attempt to make cancer treatment affordable in country areas. The situation with radiotherapy has improved--it's now subsidised so I won't be out of pocket for that element of my treatment. For which I am extremely grateful. 10 years ago I couldn't afford radiation therapy and was not told that I could have had it in at a metro area. So I didn't have it. Which may (or may not) have made a difference to my current circumstances.
I'm not working and simply can not afford to pay those pirates--it would cost me my home and I'm pretty much screwed anyway so being broke, homeless and dying isn't an attractive option. I might add, that I worked right through my first episode and have been made redundant recently, so the not working bit is not by choice.
Ironically, it costs the system (that's you and me) about the same for my to claim VTPAS for every trip as It would to subsidise the gap between what the Pirates charge and what medicare rebates. I'm going to Make A Fuss. Anyone else got a tale to tell about this?