Forum Discussion

Anonymous's avatar
Anonymous
14 years ago

Please excuse my venting....grrrr..

My apologies in advance for this post.....BUT I NEED TO VENT!

OK. So I am diagnosed with EBC in 2008. I have a lumpectomy (& nodes removed), chemo, radio, trial drug Lapatinib (instead of Herceptin), and Tamoxifin. Since 2008 I have had regular blood tests (initially 3 monthly, then 6 monthly), yearly mammograms, physical exams...all clear. I ask what tests will be done to screen for any reoccurance...eg .can I have a 'regular'  full body scan? Can I have ANY scans done that will detect a reoccurance? can I have cancer marker blood tests done? I am told that none of this is necessary....'there is no test for an absence of cancer' I am told. I am also reminded about the risks of exposure to unnecessary radiation.  I am told to just monitor my breasts, look for any changes etc, and to attend all BC appointments focussing on monitoring my breast health, get mammograms, have general blood tests done and manage anxiety levels. I am uneasy about this response, but am trusting the expert advice given, and under the impression all this time that I am doing all I can to be monitored for any reoccurrence (eg thinking a reoccurrence would happen in the breast). My last series of appointments (mammogram, physical exam and blood tests) was in April this year when I got the "all clear"....clearly this was not the case!

Why couldn't I have had cancer maker blood tests done? Why couldn't I have had a yearly full body scan done? Why was I told this wasn't necessary? Why is the emphasis and focus on checking breasts when in actual fact the risk is high for a reoccurrance in lungs, bones, brain and liver? I am so f%@*$#g annoyed! I guess I am looking for someone to blame. Is it my fault? Should I have been more assertive? Insistent on the 'extra' testing? Did I fail myself?...or did my medical team fail me?

Now am I being offered all these tests...Every test under the sun, including cancer blood marker tests. While I am grateful for being offered them, wouldn't it make more sense to have had them as part of the general monitoring regime in the first say 5 years after an EBC diagnosis? I am so annoyed. It's not fair...there is something seriously wrong here!

What about the phone call I received advising that the trial drug appears to be less effective than first thought...had I not got this phone call, these small spots on my lungs would never have been discovered until it was too late! To me that just doesnt make sense! Is cost a factor in all of this.....The costs of the testing and scans on the public system (as I am a public patient)? I dont know and I dont understand.

I was naive first time around I think...there is either something really wrong with this picture or I am still as naive as I was back in 2008! I will have lots of questions to ask at Tuesday's appointment...I need to ease my mind because this is doing my head in!

My apologies for the rant...I know in time the anger will subside but for now i am really pissed off...grrrr...