Forum Discussion
- JustDiagnosedMemberThanks Marg, that all sounds like it should. The only thing is, I've been accepted as one of 30 women in Australia to receive ribociclib as a compassionate drug for newly-diagnosed patients. But after completing endless amounts of paperwork, tests and scans, and being told to expect the drug 2 weeks ago, I've only just been told it will likely now be 12 more months. To receive it I need to stay 'newly diagnosed' by not taking Letrozole, which isn't really an option if I want to keep the cancer at bay. Not an easy choice!
Anne-Marie - ZoffielMember
Ethics committees are a vital component of any research project. This concept extends past the health arena. Ethics committees ensure that any project is not just lawful, but that it adheres to the ethical standards of the organization that is supporting the proposal.
They can be a right pain in the arse on occasions, but they exist to make sure that no-one spears off and starts conducting experiments, supporting treatments or concepts (or even just asking questions in a survey) that do not protect the participants from potential harm and the organization itself from litigation or reputational damage.
Ethics committees will also, in theory, pick up conflicts of interest and tick all manner of boxes relating to the relationship between the proposal and the organization's operations. Issues can arise when an idea/concept/product is so novel that it can't be reasonably compared against previous projects in the organization's field. It's then that they really have to work--'Is this thing genuine, is it a good idea, is there any evidence to support this? Is it part of our remit? What happens if we are wrong?'
It all sounds like a load of old cobblers, but without ethics committees all manner of shitty behavior would go on. It would be really hard for anyone to figure out what was a legitimate project and what was just the classic evil professor (either established or in embryo) doing what ever he/she felt like.
Ethics committees have been responsible for doing all sort of good stuff; putting in standards controlling the treatment of animals during research in universities, for example.
Not sure if that helps. Marg
- JustDiagnosedMemberDoes anyone know what an 'ethics committee' is or does? Why does a compassionate drug need to go before them when I have already completed everything they have asked for?
Anne-Marie - JustDiagnosedMemberSandra, this is an awesome idea. Is anyone with me on this one if I try it out?
- sandramjMemberLaws and trials and regulations regarding health issues seem BRUTAL when we are suffering a condition where we can see the treatment, know it's just there ahead of us, yet we can't access it NOW. Medical cannabis is just ONE of these treatments, like palbocliclib and I wonder if the people concerned could form a class action and sue the government for not providing a treatment causing pain and suffering to the patient and family. It may not sound ethical, but seriously when things are a life and death situation we need to act extremely too. Just saying......,..
- iserbrownMember@JustDiagnosed
from the BCNA site - hopefully gives you an understanding of the work BCNA are doing and please ring them to help you through
https://www.bcna.org.au/news/2017/08/no-pbs-listing-for-new-breast-cancer-drugs-ribociclib-and-palbociclib/ - iserbrownMember@JustDiagnosed
Ring BCNA for some help..............they are open today - I just copy and paste this for you:Address: 293 Camberwell Rd, Camberwell VIC 3124Phone:1800 500 258Hours:Open today · 9:30am–2pm - primekMemberOh My... how ridiculous. ...can someone from bcna be an advocate for you? This is totally unacceptable. I hope some movers and shakers on here can help you. Kath x
- JustDiagnosedMemberHi there. I am recently diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer (3 months) and my oncologist wanted to start me on palbociclib but it didn't make the PBS in June. I have been petitioning Federal MPs and the PBS about it, but in the meantime found out about the compassionate scheme for ribociclib for newly-diagnosed patients. This was for people with under 29 days of treatment with Letrozole (I was on day 26) and therefore we decided to stop my treatment and apply (a massive process). 2 weeks ago I was informed that I am one of the 30 Australian women to be granted this drug by Novartis, but we've been waiting daily for it to arrive. Two days ago I had a call from the hospital to say it looks as though it will now go before an Ethics Committee (whatever that is!) which will take up to 12 months. In the meantime I cannot take any more Letrozole or I will lose my place on the compassionate scheme. Am I supposed to take no treatment whatsoever for another year, just to qualify as 'newly diagnosed'? I don't understand why they can do this to us! It's hard enough living in a rural community, as we're a long way from the cancer hospitals as it is! Not expecting any replies, just having a bit of a vent...
- sandramjMemberCosts are always a problem when supplying ordinary Australians with cancer etc yet we can donate billions to Indonesia etc. they forget it's our tax we've paid over the fifty plus years in the workforce. Charity begins at home.