Hello everyone,I am currently doing my second attempt at hormonal therapy drugs, and I hate it; no surprises there. I do all the things...take all the advice, all the stuff that is meant to make HT easier. But there’s only so much mindfulness you can do before just saying hey this stuff sucks and I don’t know if it’s worth it. I may be looking for a needle in a haystack lol but I’m really curious to know if the stats my onco tells me every time I see her can ever be wrong. I guess I also am in horrible denial about having to take these drugs for the rest of my life. I just can’t believe the only choice I have is life-stealing HT side effects or more breast cancer. I am very rational and scientific so of course I will take them based on the evidence and hope it prevents a relapse. I still feel so ripped off though. My question is: have any women out there started on that long jail sentence of HT meds, found that it completely ruined their quality of life, tried their very best to make it work but couldn’t, then went off it completely and DIDN’T have a relapse of breast cancer ever again? Has anyone heard any stories like this?H xo

Over the years, a repeating theme in these sort of conversations is the feeling that side effects of AI drugs are either underplayed or dismissed as being extremely uncommon. I think this is very unfair and verges on being unethical.Yes, the drug companies list the 'less serious' side effects: dizziness, hair loss, muscle and joint pain, fatigue, sleeplessness etc. But then they mitigate the information by saying the majority of users do not have 'serious' side effects. You know, strokes, heart attacks, depressions, fractures due to loss of bone density and other great stuff. What isn't said is how terribly common the suite of miseries that accompanies the drugs really are.Would we still take it? Quite probably. It's the absence of true informed consent that pisses me off. Then your general misery is discounted as being unusual, passing, all in your head and we don't want to frighten people away from the best chance of survival on offer. Humph.It brings to mind the attitudes to post natal depression that proliferated until pretty recently. It was rare, uncommon, passing, all in your head, you will get over it and we don't discuss it because we don't want you to worry. As if you could talk yourself into wanting to harm yourself or your child.. How patronizing and destructive was that?

I’ve been on Letrozole 8 months and I despise the side effects it creates! I wrote this in the wee small hours one night. Necessary EvilLying in bed wide awake,Everything points to the meds I take.The side effects give me the shits!Reality of 112 more months, thrills me to bits.Occupied with the weight I’ve gained,Zombified by insomnia hurts my brain.Oncologist I might just Obloguy,Letrozole is my sentence and time drags by.Ecstatic is not how I feel, it really is a lousy deal!Just excersizing my right to a pity party... a new day and a better attitude.... but Letrozole definitely sucks!!

@kezmusc - forewarned is forearmed so thanks for the links.I go looking for the most devastating example I can find of everything.I've read what I should be having is some THZ1 with equal portions of fulvestrant.(sounds like TLC with a ciggie)As soon as I find out what they are I'll investigate how they react together and get back to youse all.Yeah sure! LOL@kmakm - My oncologist wanted me to start taking calcium immediately until I told him I drink a litre of lassi a day, am a big cheese eater and love hot chocolates and lattes. I also remind him that I had a heart attack 2 and a half years ago and don't think I need to add to my heart condition (another area where drugs are dished out willy nilly) by adding extra calcium.@"Holly Prevails" and @Zoffiel - The only specialist that has been brutally honest with me has been my radiologist. She told me my circumstances were bleak and that she would be frying me down to the bone, if necessary. She's the only one that has said there will be pain and here are the painkillers. I love her and so do all her other patients. When strolls thru the waiting room she talks and laughs with all her patients, is very tactile and naturally friendly. The rest I wouldn't trust to save myself!!!

My mother had brutal sledgehammer chemo in 1986. She was told it was the strongest known to man. She'd found a lump, had a mastectomy and was told the cancer was in her lymphatic system. She didn't even have an oncologist. She was 51. There was no radiation, no hormonal therapy, no reconstruction. She is still alive today annoying the bejesus out of me at 83, and has said the hardest medical thing in her life was her heart valve replacement last year.My sister found multiple lumps at 45, had a mastectomy, chemo, radiation and went onto Tamoxifen. It came back and she died at 47.There is much we understand, and much we don't. Everyone's cancer is different, our bodies are different. We all just have to do the best for ourselves, which is very individual, and hope for the best, which is universal.I'm throwing the kitchen sink at mine. However I'm yet to start the HT. I'll get back to you...

But we do trust them to save ourselves @PatsyN Despite all our fears and misgivings, our insecurities and internal conflicts, we hand ourselves over and hope for the best..Ive had my trust betrayed more often than its been rewarded, but what choice do I have?Some of the medicos I've met have changed my life for the better. Some have been arrogant, dismissive a***. It seems the bigger the a***, the bigger the ego and the less substance there is to the soul. The worst blunders I've experienced have been perpetrated by people who are totally incapable, despite all the evidence, of admitting they f*** up. They have also had the highest qualifications.I do make allowances for those who's personality types are better suited to life in a laboratory because they have no empathy for living things. I just wish they wouldn't venture out into the public domain.

Ditching the 5-year sentence of hormonal therapy?

76 Replies

Kiwi_Angel
Member
8 years ago
@Sister I’m the same as u - I feel information and education is the best weapon against this disease. I would rather be armed with all the facts.
Sister
Member
8 years ago
@kezmusc Informed is always better than ignorant no matter how unpalatable. I've always said to my medical team that, while I hope they're right that I'm cancer free and the treatment is precautionary, I'm doing it because I want to stay around long enough to take advantage of further advances if bc does recur.
Kiwi_Angel
Member
8 years ago
@kezmusc just read your articles - interesting and depressing. Almost seems like u need to stay on the drugs for 10 years to forever with no guarantees it won’t pop up somewhere else all whilst possibly having a crappy quality of life!! Cancer is a sneaky little fu**er!!
kezmusc
Member
8 years ago
Yeah I know @Sister. I really ummed and aahhed about putting the links up for a number of hours. Sorry. Xoxo
Sister
Member
8 years ago
@"Kiwi Angel" I had never heard that about Vitamin D and mine is generally low in the cooler months (not much sun up here). Interestingly, I was asking my onc if I could fill an earlier prescription for Vitamin D last appointment, and he commented that they were told at med school that Australians would never need supplements of it. I don't know exactly how old he is but I would think early 50s.
As for side effects, when have most of the medical profession or society ever considered the greater impact of health care on women's well-being? We're either lumped into a myth of fragile flowers who complain about the slightest thing or we're some sort of super-beings because of our ability to cope with childbirth. Actually, we're just people, very similar to the other half of the population.
@kezmusc After reading those 2 articles, I almost feel that I would like to be an ostrich - they were a gut punch.
@zoffiel You may have to start a revolution. I'll be standing by your side!
Kiwi_Angel
Member
8 years ago
@kezmusc - would not surprise me in th slightest - seems to suck the life out of u.
kezmusc
Member
8 years ago
Doesn't chemo deplete vit D @"Kiwi Angel" Least that's what I was told. That's why they tested it. Mine was rock bottom three weeks after chemo. Back to normal with in three months.
Kiwi_Angel
Member
8 years ago
Just saw the oncologist and she said she will discuss further after chemo when I am going to start on it but she finds tamoxifen better side effect wise than the AI’s. Since I haven’t been through menopause yet (they would do blood testing to confirm) I should go on the tamoxifen but if that doesn’t agree I can go the AI’s but I would more testing, injections to put me into menopause or have my ovaries removed - all very cheerful and she thinks these have more side effects. Will just have to take it one step at a time. She also told me that my vitamin D was low which has been linked with certain cancers, breast cancer being one of them.
Faerygirl
Member
8 years ago
I’ve been on Letrozole 8 months and I despise the side effects it creates! I wrote this in the wee small hours one night.
Necessary Evil
Lying in bed wide awake,
Everything points to the meds I take.
The side effects give me the shits!
Reality of 112 more months, thrills me to bits.
Occupied with the weight I’ve gained,
Zombified by insomnia hurts my brain.
Oncologist I might just Obloguy,
Letrozole is my sentence and time drags by.
Ecstatic is not how I feel, it really is a lousy deal!

Just excersizing my right to a pity party... a new day and a better attitude.... but Letrozole definitely sucks!!
iserbrown
Member
8 years ago
Best wishes for your appointment. Mention that you've had sensitive reactions

Forum Discussion

Ditching the 5-year sentence of hormonal therapy?

76 Replies

Recent Discussions

How soon after mastectomy can unusual scar be "tidied"

Predict - Breast Cancer app

What to expect - AC after Carbo/paclitaxel/pembro

Monash Health or Peter Mac

Microcalcification biopsy