Learning
8 years agoMember
Focal thin walled lymphovascular invasion
Hi everyone
New here....been lurking on the sidelines for a few weeks having been diagnosed in October with early stage breast cancer (Luminal A). There is an aspect of my post lumpectomy pathology that continues too gnaw away at me ....over and above the whole cancer thing that is! It was the finding that there was "Focal thin walled lymphovascular invasion present" but no nodal involvement. From my reading and questions to my practitioners it seems this is a controversial prognostic factor and reassurances from my oncologist that the hormone therapy (which I have just started as my radiation has just finished) will address this, have done little to assuage my anxiety. I read on a community forum (even though I know its not a good idea to lean on google as a member of my treating team) the assertion in quotation marks below. Does anyone know if there really is a distinction between levels of invasion or indeed can anyone cast any light on this issue at all?
"LVI is present" means that they see tumour cells within blood or Lymphaetic cells in the sample they are testing. This does not necessarily mean that the tumour cells are traveling your body. It just increases the chances that there may be. There are three levels of LVI, which are: Focal - very small area of sample showing LVI. No effect on recurrence/ prognosis. Intermediate/Moderate - an area of the sample is showing LVI. No effect on recurrence/prognosis. Extensive - LVI covers a large portion or the entire sample. Does effect recurrence as if it was one positive lymph node"
Thanks in advance, I am in awe of the generosity, compassion and fighting spirit of all of you.
Tanya
New here....been lurking on the sidelines for a few weeks having been diagnosed in October with early stage breast cancer (Luminal A). There is an aspect of my post lumpectomy pathology that continues too gnaw away at me ....over and above the whole cancer thing that is! It was the finding that there was "Focal thin walled lymphovascular invasion present" but no nodal involvement. From my reading and questions to my practitioners it seems this is a controversial prognostic factor and reassurances from my oncologist that the hormone therapy (which I have just started as my radiation has just finished) will address this, have done little to assuage my anxiety. I read on a community forum (even though I know its not a good idea to lean on google as a member of my treating team) the assertion in quotation marks below. Does anyone know if there really is a distinction between levels of invasion or indeed can anyone cast any light on this issue at all?
"LVI is present" means that they see tumour cells within blood or Lymphaetic cells in the sample they are testing. This does not necessarily mean that the tumour cells are traveling your body. It just increases the chances that there may be. There are three levels of LVI, which are: Focal - very small area of sample showing LVI. No effect on recurrence/ prognosis. Intermediate/Moderate - an area of the sample is showing LVI. No effect on recurrence/prognosis. Extensive - LVI covers a large portion or the entire sample. Does effect recurrence as if it was one positive lymph node"
Thanks in advance, I am in awe of the generosity, compassion and fighting spirit of all of you.
Tanya