Hi all Am confirmed for the workshop on Breast Density here in Adelaide next Thursday 23 August.I am prepared to put any questions the blog has on this issue and report back on the responses. In addition I hope to upload a summary of what I learn on the day - just may need to be the week after as my twins are turning 18 that weekend and have 80th birthdays ( yep plural) on the Friday. As the workshop is 10 - 4 on Thursday will take any questions to the workshop that. I have up until 5pm the day before - Wednesday.

Just curiously @ arpie pointed out that WA is the only state that tells women that they dense breasts.I gather dense breasts renders mammography a poor indicator of early breast cancer.Admit to being intrigued why the workshop is looking at the Legal and Ethical considerations of revealing this information to women about THEIR breasts.

I would have thought if people were aware they had dense breasts and what the implications are they might be more vigilant and have the opportunity to make lifestyle changes that may reduce their risk.In addition if I knew I had dense breasts I doubt I would have used HRT which is a known risk factor for breast cancer.

I'm also perplexed as to why this would be an issue which is why I haven't responded to you @Romla - I'm not sure if I understand the scope of the workshop as what I'm reading seems bizarre.Anyway, my thoughts are:I had dense breasts but was never told this was an issue when I had a diagnostic mammogram in my 30s (the cancer diagnosed in my 50s was in a similar if not, the same place as the cyst diagnosed back then). My genetic oncologist has said that, although I do not test positive for any of the known BC genes, she is confident there is a familial genetic link due to family history. I have 2 teenage daughters and it has been recommended that they start screening at 30. Chances are that they will also have dense breasts. How can it possibly be okay to allow a woman to be screened and not tell her that her negative result is just a maybe? It can take a lot of courage to go for screening for many women; even more so when they have a family history. I believe it is unethical and immoral, and I believe should be illegal, to allow that woman to think that she is clear when it is far from certain due to it being difficult to determine. The other problem of course, is that we all lead busy lives and many women leave their own health last so it is quite likely they may not go in for their mammograms as regularly as everyone would wish. This means that any cancer has more time to grow if it was not picked up due to density, and if she is not aware that could be a issue.As you say, it is about giving women information about their own bodies. I'm losing my words here and can't think of the term I'm looking for but it's along the lines of "a failure to provide reasonable and accurate medical information/service". I wish I was able to go to it with you @romla but at this stage, radiation is smack bang in the middle.

@Sister I will take notes and put your thoughts forward but you might be able to alter the time of day of your radiation .I did mine at St Andrews and that was an option mentioned at the outset BUT you do family commitments and may also be getting too tired by it all.A late booking I know is ok as they stuffed up the email address and I had to ring one of the academic organisers about it as my emails kept bouncing back. Above all do what is best and works for YOU .

Yep - I am with @Sister with this one ..... not only immoral and unethical, but bordering on criminal!The only ethical or moral dilemma is that they are doing NOTHING ABOUT IT!If it is good for WA (and apparently they are having lower incidences of the more advanced invasive BCs in women being tested in other ways ....) then it is good enough for ALL the other states. It is no skin off their nose, just to keep us informed!If my GP hadn't found my lumps - I'd be sitting here with them steadily growing FAST until my NEXT mammogram that also wouldn't show them! :(

Breast Density | BCNA Online Network

Sister
Member
7 years ago
I'm also perplexed as to why this would be an issue which is why I haven't responded to you @Romla - I'm not sure if I understand the scope of the workshop as what I'm reading seems bizarre.

Anyway, my thoughts are:

I had dense breasts but was never told this was an issue when I had a diagnostic mammogram in my 30s (the cancer diagnosed in my 50s was in a similar if not, the same place as the cyst diagnosed back then). My genetic oncologist has said that, although I do not test positive for any of the known BC genes, she is confident there is a familial genetic link due to family history. I have 2 teenage daughters and it has been recommended that they start screening at 30. Chances are that they will also have dense breasts. How can it possibly be okay to allow a woman to be screened and not tell her that her negative result is just a maybe? It can take a lot of courage to go for screening for many women; even more so when they have a family history. I believe it is unethical and immoral, and I believe should be illegal, to allow that woman to think that she is clear when it is far from certain due to it being difficult to determine. The other problem of course, is that we all lead busy lives and many women leave their own health last so it is quite likely they may not go in for their mammograms as regularly as everyone would wish. This means that any cancer has more time to grow if it was not picked up due to density, and if she is not aware that could be a issue.

As you say, it is about giving women information about their own bodies. I'm losing my words here and can't think of the term I'm looking for but it's along the lines of "a failure to provide reasonable and accurate medical information/service".

I wish I was able to go to it with you @romla but at this stage, radiation is smack bang in the middle.
Romla
Member
7 years ago
Just curiously @ arpie pointed out that WA is the only state that tells women that they dense breasts.I gather dense breasts renders mammography a poor indicator of early breast cancer.Admit to being intrigued why the workshop is looking at the Legal and Ethical considerations of revealing this information to women about THEIR breasts.

Forum Discussion

Breast Density

Related Content

Scanxiety - bone mineral density

Improving Bone Density

Understanding Breast Density - Professor Wendy Ingman

Bone density - dr recommendations

Having breasts removed

Recent Discussions

Listening to Raelene Boyle's podcast is well worth it, as well as Charlotte Tottman's!

Tamoxifen and inflammation

ENCORE - Hunter region

Running on Chemo (ROC)

Breast Surgeons - South Australia

Disclaimer:

Foundation partner	Major partners