Forum Discussion

lorraine4877's avatar
15 years ago

zometa for osteopaenia

Found out today I have osteopaenia.Quite upset cause of all the excercise I have done including weight lifting.I didn't expect this.I will be having 1 infusion of Zometa every month for 12months.Can anyone out there tell me if this sounds a lot?

I did some research on the net and apparently I should be happy to be getting it as it has been proven to reduce the the chance of bone mets.Some places in the world give it to all B/C patients as a matter of course along with chemo.I was too shocked today to ask enough questions so would appreciate any imput here.I thought apart from having to take an estrogen blocker daily for 5 years my treatment was in the bag.

6 Replies

  • I have also been osteopaenic - still am or have got worse? The Tamoxifen taken after primary cancer 13 years ago for 5 years was helping to weaken my bones (blocking oestrogen does this) and my GP later put me on Fosomax to increase bone density. It definitely helped but was just for 5 years. Now for mets in bones I am taking Arimidex (blocks oestrogen) and at first took Bonifos(sp?) - 2 large tablets an hour before eating & staying upright throughout - but changed to Bondronat, which was easier - 1 small tablet & half an hour. I decided to try out the infusion, Zometa, once a month to avoid the need to take the daily (nuisance) tablet. I had such debilitating pain in my upper back lasting almost the whole month, apart from the slight flu-like symptoms for a day or so, starting a couple of days after each infusion, that after 3 infusions with the same reaction each time, I went back to the Bondronat with no side effects at all. I don't even have mets in that part of my back - just the degeneration of the spine, they're calling osteoarthritis. No one else seems to have had a reaction like mine so it's odd. On Arimidex & Bondronat I feel normal and healthy and hope they'll go on working for a long time. I've never used Femara but all the different oestrogen blockers are bad for bones. I also take Calcium & Vitamin D tablets every day - not to be taken at same time as Bondronat! All the best, Nellie

  • Hi there,

    I have done heaps of research now about this drug and it seems to be really good at building up the bones and protecting them from cancer cells too.Some trials have indicated that is attacks tumours too.

    They are having great results with it treating bone mets from breast cancer.People with osteoarthritis get infusions once a year.

    After checking it out I think I am quite fortunate that i will be getting it every month for a year.It's only a 15 min infusion but the only drag is I have to go to the chemo unit for it just when I thought I didn't have to go back there.I am having it because my bones have ostopenia and taking femara which damages your bones.

  • Hi, I will be asking my medical oncologist about this when I next see him - after my chemo is complete.  I have been on Tamoxifen for 4.3 years until I was re-diagnosed in December.  I was immediately put on Arimidex which of course can leach our bones of calcium.  Whilst on chemo I have been taken off the Arimidex but will most likely commence after next consultation with MO.  So many things to consider - one drug helps with one thing but there is alway side effects. I am always mindful of my bones and in my "normal" life do lots of weight resistance to strengthen them.   I suppose, like you, we can only keep doing what we think is helping us lead better lives. XLeonie

  • I looked up the issue on wiki and there is some controversy about the "condition" in that its possibly an indicator that you are at risk of developing osteoporsis, but itself may be flag for only a small percentage of the population, and whether products from pharmacueticals providing benefits may be marginal at improving the the T score (I am not referring to any further mets risk, as that is not mentioned)

     

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osteopenia

     

    [edit] 

  • I looked up the issue on wiki and there is some controversy about the "condition" in that its possibly an indicator that you are at risk of developing osteoporsis, but itself may be flag for only a small percentage of the population, and whether products from pharmacueticals providing benefits may be marginal at improving the the T score (I am not referring to any further mets risk, as that is not mentioned)

     

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osteopenia

     

    [edit] 

  • I looked up the issue on wiki and there is some controversy about the "condition" in that its possibly an indicator that you are at risk of developing osteoporsis, but itself may be flag for only a small percentage of the population, and whether products from pharmacueticals providing benefits may be marginal at improving the the T score (I am not referring to any further mets risk, as that is not mentioned)

     

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osteopenia

     

    [edit]