Forum Discussion

Shakalker's avatar
Shakalker
Member
6 years ago

Scan or not to Scan - Post treatment

I have now completed treatment and I’m on Letrazole.
I had IDC grade 3 ER + clear margins, 2x lymph nodes with adenocarcinoma and High grade DCIS - margins involved.
I had 3x FEC and 1 out of 3 Docetaxel (Nasty stuff)
25 rads.

No re section for DCIS, I was told chemo and radiation would take care of any cells left behind.

I had a meeting with my surgeon on Wednesday and I asked whether I was to have a scan to check effectiveness of what I’d been through.
I believed that 3 months after treatment this was normal.
I was given a long drawn out story about the pros and cons of scans and told I would be best to wait and see if I get symptoms of returning cancers rather than having a scan which could show nothing however I could have G zero cells hiding and waiting to become active at any time, proving a negative scan wrong.
I was also told G zero cells are dormant and are not affected by chemotherapy and can become active at any time and return. 
There was so much more I was told, that was in some ways a total back flip to what I was told in the beginning.

Long and short, has anyone else been told this?




24 Replies

  • @Shakalker this is a good point but one my Oncologist answered to me also straight from treatment. Upon completion it is natural and normal for everyone to want to know if their body is all clear. The reality is though? the scans wouldnt show anything generally, most BC is slow growing, I think the earliest he'd do one for me was at 6 months. It makes alot of sense, the other thing he mentioned is unfortunately we are not advanced at all...that we are only as good as detecting it once it is there :/ we still haven't got a foot in front of it. I too am ER+ and was Grade 3 no LN involvement, I too had 4 rounds of FEC and I had 8 rounds of Taxol. He did say if I had any complaints they would definitely do scans and investigate but that would be the only time. As Id had a recurrence already 4yrs after the initial in same spot, I had a mastectomy/diep flap recon. He said he wasnt monitoring me for BC anymore but rather a secondary...you could IMAGINE how taken back I was. For someone who bounces into his appointments as of this year its yearly not 6 monthly, going into 4 years clear! that doesnt even cross my mind! I'm focused on moving forward! lol x
  • It remains a slightly distressing fact though, no matter the science and stats behind it. You have the awful Big C diagnosis, incredibly invasive, toxic and destructive treatments, and for 70%, are then placed onto long term medication that is often very difficult to take. To be met with a 'but we won't be checking if any of this has worked/is working', especially if the technology exists, seems odd to weird to the lay person.

    I do understand why, but I still scratch my head that at 51, with a strong family history of BC (mother, and deceased sister) I have not had a single scan in the entire experience.

    I know that if it metastasises it metatastises and knowing now or six months later will make no difference to the outcome. My oncologist said that it takes a million cancer cells before anything is visible.

    It doesn't stop me worrying about finding a recurrence (or a new breast cancer) earlier rather than later, for myself and anyone else. So much of surviving BC is the mental struggle. It'd be so nice to have the possibility of settling our worries once every year or two.
  • @primek thanks for this info, I had not seen this before, it answers a lot 
    👍🏻