Wow I'm really overwhelmed by these responses, thank you for this. There is a lot to take in, this will take me a while. A few themes coming out though about side effects of hormone therapy, emotional well being, stage 4 cancer, and increased understanding/education for health professionals. I will have a think and a chat to my colleagues about these. I work with a group who are interested in how estrogen affects the brain, their research is unrelated to breast cancer treatment, but I wonder if they might have a fresh perspective on the "brain fog".
Jo, thanks for the link to your campaign about mammography screening for women under 50, I will have a look at it. Yes, density is part of the problem here - dense breasts are more common in younger women and this lowers the sensitivity of the mammogram. You asked about Australian stats, we don't have statistics on frequency of different breast density categories in Australian women, we have to rely on American data
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4200066/. If you follow the link here you can download a PDF of the article. Figure 1 shows the prevalence of density categories broken down by age groups. In women aged 40-44, 13% have D density (extremely dense), 44% have C (heterogeneously dense). In women aged 45-49, 12% have D and 43% have C.
Breast cancer survivors have been changing the world for decades in so many ways. They are the reason why we have foundations such as National Breast Cancer Foundation who have been enormously successful in driving the research forward. BCNA, founded by Lyn Swinburne, is an organisation with a very strong advocacy voice nationally. And of course the dearly missed Nancy Cappello, who was the inspiration behind the first breast density notification law in the USA. I do hope you are aware of the power you have as individuals and as a collective.
Please keep writing in your suggestions.