Blog Post
ElsieJ
9 months agoMember
For many years I've had non-BreastScreen mammograms routinely every second year because I've had a history of breast cysts and so I've always wanted to have an ultrasound as well as the mammogram. Whilst I knew I had dense breasts which can make radiography reporting difficult I did not realise until after my diagnosis that having dense breasts in itself is a risk. No one (doctors) had ever advised me this be the case.
So after 5 years of being told everything was ok and I only have "fibrocystic disease", including my last mammogram and US only 2 months prior to my noticing an abnormality of my breast, I was diagnosed with Stage 3 breast cancer (>5cm and positive nodes)! I admit my cancer presented in a lobular pattern which also made it hard to see on the mammogram and US imaging but my MRI sure lit up like a Christmas tree.
I know doing MRIs is much debated and not routinely offered but I could have got diagnosed years ago at a much earlier stage if this had been recommended because of my dense breasts. Hopefully the future of contrast mammography will be a good alternative. There has to be better ways of monitoring and diagnosing as I was not diagnosed on either the mammogram or the ultrasound.
For me it is annoying that no one had ever discussed my breast cancer risk because of my having dense breasts itself or recommended that I could attend a breast clinic for better monitoring beyond the routine testing I had routinely done in good faith.
So after 5 years of being told everything was ok and I only have "fibrocystic disease", including my last mammogram and US only 2 months prior to my noticing an abnormality of my breast, I was diagnosed with Stage 3 breast cancer (>5cm and positive nodes)! I admit my cancer presented in a lobular pattern which also made it hard to see on the mammogram and US imaging but my MRI sure lit up like a Christmas tree.
I know doing MRIs is much debated and not routinely offered but I could have got diagnosed years ago at a much earlier stage if this had been recommended because of my dense breasts. Hopefully the future of contrast mammography will be a good alternative. There has to be better ways of monitoring and diagnosing as I was not diagnosed on either the mammogram or the ultrasound.
For me it is annoying that no one had ever discussed my breast cancer risk because of my having dense breasts itself or recommended that I could attend a breast clinic for better monitoring beyond the routine testing I had routinely done in good faith.
Related Content
1 MIN READ
After 27 years of BCNA advocacy, we've reached a milestone moment: For the first time, Australia has a national figure for people living with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). That number is 20,950 ...
11 days ago44Views
6likes
1Comment
For the first time, data shows that 20,950 Australians (20,800 women and 150 men) are living with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This figure is double previous estimates and exposes the scale of nee...
9 days ago22Views
3likes
0Comments
Hello all Very long time since I’ve poked my head into this discussion forum. I’d like to hear what other younger pre-menopausal patients around the country are being recommend regarding duratio...
11 months ago285Views
0likes
13Comments
Hello lovelies. This is my first post so my story first - apologies if I don't have all the medico lingo down just yet. I am 53 years old and went through menopause in 2021. Diagnosed 02.09.24 with ...
2 years ago148Views
0likes
3Comments
Australia continues to lead globally in breast cancer survival rates. The latest 2025 data reveals:
❣️ Five-year survival has risen to 93% (up from 75% in 1987–1991).
❣️ In 2025, around ...
26 days ago28Views
1like
0Comments