Blog Post
ElsieJ
28 days agoMember
For many years I've had non-BreastScreen mammograms routinely every second year because I've had a history of breast cysts and so I've always wanted to have an ultrasound as well as the mammogram. Whilst I knew I had dense breasts which can make radiography reporting difficult I did not realise until after my diagnosis that having dense breasts in itself is a risk. No one (doctors) had ever advised me this be the case.
So after 5 years of being told everything was ok and I only have "fibrocystic disease", including my last mammogram and US only 2 months prior to my noticing an abnormality of my breast, I was diagnosed with Stage 3 breast cancer (>5cm and positive nodes)! I admit my cancer presented in a lobular pattern which also made it hard to see on the mammogram and US imaging but my MRI sure lit up like a Christmas tree.
I know doing MRIs is much debated and not routinely offered but I could have got diagnosed years ago at a much earlier stage if this had been recommended because of my dense breasts. Hopefully the future of contrast mammography will be a good alternative. There has to be better ways of monitoring and diagnosing as I was not diagnosed on either the mammogram or the ultrasound.
For me it is annoying that no one had ever discussed my breast cancer risk because of my having dense breasts itself or recommended that I could attend a breast clinic for better monitoring beyond the routine testing I had routinely done in good faith.
So after 5 years of being told everything was ok and I only have "fibrocystic disease", including my last mammogram and US only 2 months prior to my noticing an abnormality of my breast, I was diagnosed with Stage 3 breast cancer (>5cm and positive nodes)! I admit my cancer presented in a lobular pattern which also made it hard to see on the mammogram and US imaging but my MRI sure lit up like a Christmas tree.
I know doing MRIs is much debated and not routinely offered but I could have got diagnosed years ago at a much earlier stage if this had been recommended because of my dense breasts. Hopefully the future of contrast mammography will be a good alternative. There has to be better ways of monitoring and diagnosing as I was not diagnosed on either the mammogram or the ultrasound.
For me it is annoying that no one had ever discussed my breast cancer risk because of my having dense breasts itself or recommended that I could attend a breast clinic for better monitoring beyond the routine testing I had routinely done in good faith.
Related Content
Hello all Very long time since I’ve poked my head into this discussion forum. I’d like to hear what other younger pre-menopausal patients around the country are being recommend regarding duratio...
3 months ago167Views
0likes
13Comments
Hello lovelies. This is my first post so my story first - apologies if I don't have all the medico lingo down just yet. I am 53 years old and went through menopause in 2021. Diagnosed 02.09.24 with ...
5 months ago141Views
0likes
3Comments
3 MIN READ
Please sign our petition before 19th February 2025. Link to petition https://tinyurl.com/zsy38u25 • The aim of this petition is to gather support for previvors (people who have had o...
3 months ago92Views
0likes
8Comments
Breast Cancer Network Australia (BCNA) is calling out the government for failing to protect Australians from genetic discrimination while showcasing its new genomics framework. Cancer Austr...
2 months ago72Views
5likes
0Comments
1 MIN READ
Hello Online Network members, We heard from our BCNA staff members attending the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia (COSA) Annual Scientific Meeting, that the 'Australian Cancer Plan' has been ...
2 years ago91Views
0likes
0Comments