It's very important to distinguish between 'miracles' that have been properly tested and found to be effective and a pitch for a reality TV show which might get your idea into a 'proper real time clinical trial.' That Charlie Te'o is on the selection committee doesn't make any difference to the fact this stuff has not been properly investigated. The person providing the 'scientific' commentary is the bloody farmer who has the only crop. Impartial? Yah reckon? The trials mentioned lack rigor.
Yes, I know, I sound like a grumpy old kill joy, but the word miracle attached to anything that is not some form of divine intervention grinds my gears.
If something helps and is demonstrated, proven, to cause no harm, have at it. If you think something makes you feel better, I'm pretty much in favour of that too. But don't be fooled by marketing or quasi scientific dribble about miracle fruit.