Help with understanding pathology report in order to choose best type of surgery
HI ladies
Saw my surgeon yesterday and thought I was well prepared with questions and information having done background reading from BCNA website and the My Journey Kit.... but now slightly confused. I had a core needle biopsy on 15 October. Apart from 18mm, IDC with papillary features the pathology report said:
the lesional tissues are negative for hormonal receptor of ER and PR. There are no myoepithelial cells present as there are no myoepithelial markers of p63 and SMMHC positive cells seen.
The report goes on to say that it is predicted as a grade 2 tumor (which is good).
Based on my initial pathology my surgeon thinks that it is likely that it is a triple negative breast cancer. I know grade 2 is the intermediate growing kind i.e. not aggressive. But of course final pathology results will not be known until after surgery and SNB scheduled for 12 Nov.
I was given the choice of a partial mastectomy with radiation or full mastectomy. I am 47, pre menopausal and for some strange reason I have a strong psychological desire to keep my nipple so am leaning towards partial mastectomy/lumpectomy - also my private health insurance doesn't cover breast reconstruction after cancer surgery.
Now I don't know whether I should consider a full mastectomy. Just wondering if women have had similar pathology results and decided to go with partial mastectomy/lumpectomy and if they are ok.
The info on the BCNA website says there is no higher chance of recurrence for triple negative but it doesn't say whether that is for lumpectomy, full mastectomy or both. Tried a link on BCNA for triple negative support group but link appears to be broken.
Thanks for sharing any personal experiences. Any information would be appreciated.
Nadine