Tasia I found a paper published online dated Sept 28,2011. It says it is peer reviewed but not sure.RAD51C Germline Mutations in Breast and Ovarian Cancer Cases from High-Risk Familieshttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0025632AbstractBRCA1 and BRCA2 are the most well-known breast cancer susceptibility genes. Additional genes involved in DNA repair have been identified as predisposing to breast cancer. One such gene, RAD51C, is essential for homologous recombination repair. Several likely pathogenic RAD51C mutations have been identified in BRCA1- and BRCA2-negative breast and ovarian cancer families. We performed complete sequencing of RAD51C in germline DNA of 286 female breast and/or ovarian cancer cases with a family history of breast and ovarian cancers, who had previously tested negative for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. We screened 133 breast cancer cases, 119 ovarian cancer cases, and 34 with both breast and ovarian cancers. Fifteen DNA sequence variants were identified; including four intronic, one 5′ UTR, one promoter, three synonymous, and six non-synonymous variants. None were truncating. The in-silico SIFT and Polyphen programs were used to predict possible pathogenicity of the six non-synonomous variants based on sequence conservation. G153D and T287A were predicted to be likely pathogenic. Two additional variants, A126T and R214C alter amino acids in important domains of the protein such that they could be pathogenic. Two-hybrid screening and immunoblot analyses were performed to assess the functionality of these four non-synonomous variants in yeast. The RAD51C-G153D protein displayed no detectable interaction with either XRCC3 or RAD51B, and RAD51C-R214C displayed significantly decreased interaction with both XRCC3 and RAD51B (p<0.001). Immunoblots of RAD51C-Gal4 activation domain fusion peptides showed protein levels of RAD51C-G153D and RAD51C-R214C that were 50% and 60% of the wild-type, respectively. Based on these data, the RAD51C-G153D variant is likely to be pathogenic, while the RAD51C- R214C variant is hypomorphic of uncertain pathogenicity. These results provide further support that RAD51C is a rare breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene.

TasiaAnother biomedical paper published on 2019 link below for your perusal. Not sure again if this is legit.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31409076/Recommendations for Preventive Care for Women with Rare Genetic Cause of Breast and Ovarian CancerAbstractAn inherited predisposition to breast cancer underlies 5-10% of breast tumors. High-risk BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes result in an 85% lifetime risk of breast cancer and a 20-60% lifetime risk of ovarian cancer. Next-generation sequencing or massive parallel sequencing are now established testing methods that enable screening for many genes that predispose to heterogeneous hereditary cancer syndromes (22 genes are required by the health insurance companies). In addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2, inherited mutations in other genes predispose to breast and/or ovarian cancer. High-risk breast cancer genes include TP53, STK11, CDH1, PTEN, PALB2, and NF1, while moderate-risk (2-4 times increased risk) breast cancer genes include ATM, CHEK2, and NBN. Moderate risk is also suggested for Lynch syndrome, MUTYH, BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51D, BARD1, FANCA, FANCC, FANCM, BLM, WRN genes. In heterozygotes for other recessive syndromes the risk of developing breast cancer is subject to current research. Low-risk genes are (mostly) irrelevant from a clinical perspective. Other genes that increase the risk of ovarian cancer include the genes for Lynch syndrome, the BRIP1, RAD51C and RAD51D genes. Preventive care should be proposed based on assumed cumulative breast cancer risk (see http: //www.mamo.cz): a risk of &gt;20% for BRCA1/2, TP53, PTEN, STK11, CDH1, PALB2, CHEK2, ATM, and NF1; and a risk of 10-20% for BRIP1, RAD51C, RAD51B, BARD1, FANCA, FANCC, FANCM, NBN, BLM, and WRN. The genetic risk should be assessed by a geneticist and be based on inherited mutations and empirical risk according to family history. Prophylactic mastectomy is considered for high-risk gene carriers but not for moderate-risk gene carriers; however, it may be considered if there is an underlying family history, a risk of parenchyma of the mammary gland, or other risk factors. Ovarian cancer risk increases significantly in carriers of the BRIP1, RAD51C, and RAD51D genes. For prevention of ovarian cancer, prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy is an important component of preventive care. In ovarian cancer families with no identified risk germline mutation, preventive salpingo-oophorectomy is not routinely recommended but may be considered as the only efficient method of prevention due to the increased empirical risk (4 times) of ovarian cancer in first-degree relatives. Supported by the grant project MH CZ - RVO (MMCI, 00209805), AZV 15-27695A and AZV 16-29959A. The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers. Submitted: 17. 5. 2019 Accepted: 31. 5. 2019.

Abbydog said: Could the Onc give you some information? Or refer you to a reliable website.It would be better than you being misinformed. Not saying that you are. The only limited info was heavily saturated by medical jargon so I received a verbal summary. No specific website - info is basically similar to what Jen has posted (thank you Jen). Lean on substance. What I do know from my own research and Onc discussions is that RAD51C has a strong association with TNBC and very high risk of ovarian cancer. Hence, preventative surgery needed to reduce cancers interest in taking up residence elsewhere; as we know, no guarantees.

All fingers crossed 🤞🤞🤞🤞🤞 @Tasia that the preventative surgeries work 🍀🍀🍀

I've been trying to look this up and haven't found much. Were you given any printed information?Is it definitely different to BRCA 1 and BRCA 2?

Forum Discussion

Tasia

Member

5 years ago

Has anyone tested positive for the RAD gene mutation?

Thank you x

11 Replies

Abbydog
Member
5 years ago
I've been trying to look this up and haven't found much. Were you given any printed information?
Is it definitely different to BRCA 1 and BRCA 2?

Recent Discussions

Letrozole
3 days ago
Kezzagal
⚠️ Recent badge email notification error
4 days ago
Christina_BCNA
Hope
4 days ago
Pink_Linda
Understanding Breast Density - Professor Wendy Ingman
5 days ago
arpie
👋 Monday Mingle Meet & Greet - Welcome New Members Apr27-May3 👋
5 days ago
Christina_BCNA

Forum Discussion

Has anyone tested positive for the RAD gene mutation?

Letrozole

⚠️ Recent badge email notification error

Hope

Understanding Breast Density - Professor Wendy Ingman

👋 Monday Mingle Meet & Greet - Welcome New Members Apr27-May3 👋