Forum Discussion
JJ70
6 years agoMember
Yes all good points @arpie. Definitely 3D for less invasive treatments and yes, you would think that over time it would save $$, not to mention the lower impact on each individual and collectively too. It is just the initial outlay. ATM they are focusing on saving lives - until TOMO results show that. it is better at that than 2D........
Now ,who of us would prefer a tomo scan rather than a 2D ? My hand is definitely up!!

Now ,who of us would prefer a tomo scan rather than a 2D ? My hand is definitely up!!
