Hi everyone
BCNA is currently reviewing
the webpage we developed last year around breast density to ensure we are
keeping our members up to date with the latest research finding around breast...
Published 8 years ago
Version 1.0
Blog Post
I am keen to watch the ACA program as well - we are permanently tuned to the Seven network just now whilst the Games are on!!
I guess my boobs are dense - I've just always called them lumpy! I had my first 'cyst' scare in my late 20s & another one during menopause when I was on HRT cream & it was assumed the testosterone component had caused the tissue change back then.
I am more than happy to be a part of the discussion - anything that will identify 'earlier risk factors' that will hopefully help other women being diagnosed earlier = more minimal surgery/followup required.
My 'regular' mammogram 6 months prior to BC detection didn't show anything. My GP 'felt something' in Nov when she did a breast check as I was in for a pap smear - and she suggested I have another mammogram & ultrasound - to be sure, to be sure. I am pretty sure she mentioned me having 'dense tissue' i.e. difficult to 'feel'.
The following Mammogram I had in Dec did the '75 slice thing' so assume it was a 3D one? Even tho the GP's referral indicated the exact position of the '? tumour' - the person/?professional reading the mammogram still did not 'see it' (tho my surgeon could!) The ultrasound came back as 'inconclusive' on the 2 suspect areas and suggested a cone biopsy on both. This proved positive in both.
So how many other's cancers have been missed in the mammogram program? I am advising all my buddies to request an ultrasound now & then as I personally now have no faith in mammograms! :( They are only as good as the person 'seeing it' and writing the report!
I guess my boobs are dense - I've just always called them lumpy! I had my first 'cyst' scare in my late 20s & another one during menopause when I was on HRT cream & it was assumed the testosterone component had caused the tissue change back then.
I am more than happy to be a part of the discussion - anything that will identify 'earlier risk factors' that will hopefully help other women being diagnosed earlier = more minimal surgery/followup required.
My 'regular' mammogram 6 months prior to BC detection didn't show anything. My GP 'felt something' in Nov when she did a breast check as I was in for a pap smear - and she suggested I have another mammogram & ultrasound - to be sure, to be sure. I am pretty sure she mentioned me having 'dense tissue' i.e. difficult to 'feel'.
The following Mammogram I had in Dec did the '75 slice thing' so assume it was a 3D one? Even tho the GP's referral indicated the exact position of the '? tumour' - the person/?professional reading the mammogram still did not 'see it' (tho my surgeon could!) The ultrasound came back as 'inconclusive' on the 2 suspect areas and suggested a cone biopsy on both. This proved positive in both.
So how many other's cancers have been missed in the mammogram program? I am advising all my buddies to request an ultrasound now & then as I personally now have no faith in mammograms! :( They are only as good as the person 'seeing it' and writing the report!